Engel & Martin, LLC has successfully obtained injunctions against schools seeking to expel or suspend students following hearings that denied the due process rights of students.
Some representative decisions include:
Nokes v. Miami Univ., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136880 (S.D. Ohio)
Doe v. University of Cincinnati, 223 F.Supp.2d 704 (S.D. Ohio 2016)
Elmore v. Bellarmine Univ., 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52564 (W.D. Ky.)
Doe v. Univ. of Cincinnati, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51833
Doe v. Univ. of Cincinnati, 223 F. Supp. 3d 704 (S.D.Ohio 2016)
Engel & Martin has also been involved in some of the most significant federal appeals courts cases in this matter, including:
Doe v. Univ. of Cincinnati, 872 F.3d 393 (6th Cir. 2017)
Plummer v. Univ. of Houston, 860 F.3d 767 (5th Cir. 2016)
Doe v. Cummins 662 Fed. Appx. 437 (6th Cir. 2016).
Every case is different and unique. Engel & Martin has a track record of success in difficult cases to evaluate each matter and recommend the best course of action.
Engel & Martin has represented accused students in litigation throughout the nation, including in the following representative cases:
Doe v. Rollins College, 352 F. Supp. 3d 1205 (M.D.Fla. 2019)
Noakes v. Syracuse Univ., N.D.N.Y. No. 5:18-cv-43 (TJM/DEP), 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30132 (Feb. 26, 2019)
Doe v. Syracuse Univ., 341 F. Supp. 3d 125 (N.D.N.Y. 2018)
Doe v. Coll. of Wooster, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23411 (N.D. Ohio)
Rolph v. Hobart & William Smith Colls., 271 F. Supp. 3d 386 (W.D. NY 2017)
Doe v. Wright State Univ., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136225 (S.D. Ohio)